Accuracy of IQ Test
By Inderbir Kaur Sandhu, Ph.D
Q:
Hi, I am from Singapore and was very happy to run into your
website. My child took WISC4 normed against US children when
he was 7. Reason was he had withdrawal problems when he
entered P1 and after months of consideration I decided to
have him assessed. He is now turning 9. He took it in one
single sitting for 2.5 hours and this is the breakdown: VC
126, PR 137, WM 129, PS 109. FSIQ 133.
The school arranged for him to sit informally at a level
higher. So last year he 'did' P3 but he did not seem to cope
well with the stress particularly with much writing required
of and difficulty in Mother Tongue. And because it was not
official he had to join his age peers for each exam i.e. we
are 'straddling' two levels and always looking back,
preparing for exams four times a year. It was stressful and
again because of the informal arrangement there is a feeling
of not really belonging to any class. After much thought I
decided to stop this and let him return to his age peers so
he is 'redoing' his P3 level now.
Because he is really repeating every single piece of work
(spelling, picture compos, workbooks, worksheets) he is
unhappy and bored. We are very certain now from him and his
teachers that he switches off during lessons. His school
work today reflects a very negative attitude, a lot more
careless than last year, and handwriting is now a regular
complaint from teachers. It seems now to be 'seeping' into
his whole being, its a whole attitude problem.
I no longer expect anything to be done in terms of
differentiation within the classroom in our system here. The
teacher has 44 students also in reality he does not do as
well in his tests (ours is a test-oriented system, as you
know) as people would expect. There is no real basis to be
'advocating' for him when it doesn't show in terms of scores
that he is 'that great'.
I try to enrich him at home but his attitudes towards most
things are one of disinterest. In fact we are beginning to
think perhaps he is really average after all. He does not
think deeply as a supposedly gifted child should be, or have
sustained interest in anything. He is increasingly impulsive
in his responses so he will always give a very quick answer
without much thought (This applies to his music, his chess,
his work, anything, and more so than ever). He also gives up
very easily, no persistence, again this is worsening.
Can I ask if his test could possibly be inaccurate? (Educational Psychologist said
he was very deliberate and slow in his test, very conscious
of getting something wrong, was under self imposed stress to
do well, and gave up easily if he thinks the question is too
tough).
I also read that WM and PS, particularly PS, is not an
accurate indication. Educational Psychologist who also said that his FSIQ could
have been lowered due to his PS as he was not doing so well
in the timed tests. From your experience looking at his
subtest scores is his FSIQ accurate?
What do you suggest we do about him? We were advised to wait
for GEP screening tests but looking at him now, the way he
is, we have our doubts. Neither do we want him to feel
pressured.
A: It is such a shame that you
have to go through all these in our system - this really
sounds like a burn-out case here. In fact, your son is in
the range of scores for gifted and I guess the system here
just did not suit his needs, especially the testing. It is
very hard to determine if scores are accurate, but in this
case, it appears that he could have had better scores (based
on what the Educational Psychologist said). In fact, a single sitting may not be
very suitable for him – even adults wear off after two hours
of exams! However, scores of standardized tests are believed
to be rather accurate, unless due to certain reasons such as
extreme anxiety, child's state of mind and willingness to
take test, stress to perform, etc.
Perhaps, the school tried their best to help your son by
giving him the opportunity to be at both levels. However,
they may not have assessed him well enough and jumped on
such a decision, which I think has been detrimental. I am
actually amazed that he was doing two levels at a time,
which can be extremely taxing and stressful for a 9 year
old! It was good that you pulled him out as he would have
been totally withdrawn over time due to stress. The school
should have had him psychologically assessed in terms of his
needs, personality and readiness before allowing learning at
two levels. In fact, this appears to me to be a rather
drastic change in a child's learning. What could have been
better is gradual acceleration, or even pull-out
arrangements for certain subjects that he showed a niche in.
Perhaps, enrichment would have suited him better than
acceleration.
Do not give up on advocating for him as at this point, as
parents, you may be the only ones to "save" him. I believe
he is above average, however, does not find learning
meaningful anymore. This is the case of a bright mind in a
dull classroom. What I think you can do here is firstly, to
find out his areas of strength. He may be above average in
certain areas and these would be areas he would find more
meaningful, so look for enrichment here. The goal here is to
get him back to find learning meaningful again. Excite him
with different learning activities. If he is not in the
gifted program, you may want to consider employing a tutor
trained to teach gifted children, if you can afford it. As
parents, you need to work very hard as well. You need to
understand what his needs are and look for ways to cater for
those needs. What about his peers? Does he have a good
friend at school? Get him to socialize more a avoid him
being withdrawn and encourage interest in school.
Gifted children come in many types. This child may have been
the victim of a system that did not understand and cater
toward his needs and placed too much emphasis on testing. It
would be good to be in the gifted program but even
otherwise, I think his needs can be met – though a lot of
effort and patience may be needed as there is perhaps
already some level of damage done. This may take some time,
but you really need to help him get interested in learning
again. In Singapore schools (as in most Asian schools), from
my personal experience, testing is emphasized a great deal,
especially for gifted placement. I hope there will be a move
to looking at a combination of skills and a greater emphasis
on talent, which will come in time. I know many children who
have burnt out in such a system and also quite a few
"non-gifted" ones who have done extremely well as there was
less stress to perform and more time to explore.
You may also want to see a child psychologist to address
some of the behavioral issues especially if you feel
inadequate to handle them. However, I believe with some time
and patience, you will be able to see some results here.
Your son is not average and you know that better, so please
do not give up. You have tried helping him; perhaps a
different approach as suggested may make a difference. I
wish you the best of luck.
>> Back to
Ask an Expert
|